They are both amazing triple a titles and they are very different. It is much easier to pit battlefield and call of duty together rather than halo. Call of Duty is beginning to show its age unless they reinvent the wheel and create a new engine. Games are not meant to be futuristic though. How many games are futuristic in this market...not to many their are more games that are modern and in the past then anything. Halo is more cooperative and you have more customization abilities. COD is more arcade style, easy to drop in get a quick game and leave. THe pace is much faster which is why so many people love it. People dont want to be stuck in a game not knowing what to do, having to travel to worlds end to get to the battle. They just want to be thrown on a map with a gun and be able to get into the action as fast as possible. So if you like the fast pace shooters then COD is your spot if you like a more co-op and deeper experience then Halo is your answer.

• 1
• 0
• Reply
• Answered about 1 year ago.
• Report Abuse

wtf the NEW COD series is unreaistic in the least bit. seriously, hellhounds laser guns second change and martyr???? I doubt a real us soldier is going to drop a grenade after he died...

• 1
• 2
• 3 replies
• Answered about 1 year ago.
• Report Abuse

CALL OF DUTY DUH! HALO SUCKS! (Actually HALO is ok...BUT COD IS WAY BETTER!)

• 0
• 0
• Reply
• Answered about 1 year ago.
• Report Abuse

Are you trying to start Fanboy World War 20 billion

• 0
• 1
• Reply
• Answered about 1 year ago.
• Report Abuse

HALO REACH

HALOREACH

HALO REACH

• 0
• 1
• Reply
• Answered about 1 year ago.
• Report Abuse