if cod4 wasnt game of the year things would things be different
for example lets say cod 4 wasnt that good lets say (insert fps here) like haze was better and got GOTY would cod have been so popular. me personally no. why? becuase i think that most peoples first cod game was 4 or one of the newer ones. true cod4 was a amazing game but thats just the thing. it was so new at the time and so fresh. there was really no game quite like it.
now we have waw basically cod4 with a ww2 setting graphics are a little grittier and gameplay almost exactly the same. not so good maps and just all in all not so good. zombies IMO saved the game
mw2? well that was really not much different basically a huge update but didnt really show much that i would concider brand new. sure killstreak customization was cool but not goty worthy IMO. gameplay exactly the same with very minor differences. maps IW was always good with maps
black ops? kinda like a copy of mw2& waw
the new cods all seem to copy previous ones with minor changes.
so if cod4 wasnt good would waw mw2 ect exist?
Asked about 1 year ago in Polls & Opinion
Games: Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (X360), Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (PS3), Call of Duty: Black Ops (PS3), Call of Duty: Black Ops (X360), Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (PS3)
Tags: call of duty, game of the year, would things be different, good games, bad games
