The game was kind of confusing at first but, it gets less confusing as you go. The only thing I found that would make this game a 8.5 or a 9.0 is that its to short. I finished it about 4 hours. The on-line play is ok not like some of the shooters out there (Resistance fall of Man).I give G.R.A.W.2 online play a 7.0 . It needs work. Replay: Fairly High. Would I buy with a discount. Yes
This game is someting that I had been waiting on... Missing SOCOM so.. I thought this might be something to hold me over... and it comes close. The single player is decent enough I suppose but I really think this is about online combat is it not? The inability to choose sides coupled with the inability to invite friends to ranked games makes the online not qute work for me.. The online gameplay is solid with a little lag here and there but nothing crazy. I don't know what is so hard to get about setting up online lobbys and such. The greatest thing about online play in the ability to hook up with you buddies. GRAW denies you that pleasure.. or at least makes it much more difficult than it should be.
posted by mrkuyukot (GRANADA HILLS, CA) Sep 2, 2007
Member since Dec 2004
Game Developers should take notes. FPS should make way for 3rd person shooters. You get actual peripheral vision this way where as FPS simulates looking through a tunnel.
I've been lucky enough to have served my country during time of peace. So I can't really say this with certainty... Playing this game is how it must be like to be on a real battlezone. Sound and visuals are very immersive. I've always been a big fan of GRAW/Ubisoft. There's always room for improvement but it'll be a huge achievement if Ubisoft can top this game.