Gow style cover and shoot which was cool, cheesy kills and dialogue, didn't care about the campaign even though I played the whole thing through. Boring, but or some reason I kept playing because I thought it would get better. I did like the GOW style cover and shoot. A COD game that had more of that type of play built in would be sick. IMO.
posted by M3tal4Me (YUCCA VALLEY, CA) Sep 26, 2012
Member since Sep 2012
I rented this game because I thought the combat looked decent, and I heard the story was great. Playing it, I foun d the game to be one of my favorite games of this year.
The story is fantastic, a modern version of Apocalypse Now and Heart of Darkness. This is easily the only game that made me think about everything that I did. The graphics are good, but I recommend installing it, since there are some hiccups.
The gameplay is great. It's a very tight third person shooter. If Gears of War was placed in today's wars, it would feel an awful lot like this. The controls are tight, and every gun feels right.
The multiplayer was not meant to be in the game, and is thus lackluster. The developer once said he never wanted a multiplayer, but 2K would not publish the game unless it had a multiplayer, so they tacked it on. It's decent, but you could tell there was little effort.
However, the single player is easily where this game shines. In a day where shooters storylines are lackluster, and by the book, this game was a great, refreshing, experience that I highly recommend.
this game was pretty good for a shooter game but the way it ended was pretty crazy the weapons they has was ok I used the hand guns a lot the head shots was pretty cool when you did them lol I love head shots but all in all I say if you liked Gears of war you will like this game to