When will they finally understand that when you need the camera to move they should let you move it but when you need it to always be in the same place it is always behind you? I am going to go for the sure thing and say NEVER. This is the Problem inherent with all Games of this type very very very very very poor camera use and yet they continue to do the same kind of camera movement and non-movement, why? because that would take thinking normally and that is just never going to happen.So because of the camera and the way it works this game gets a bad rating of 3
Whoa, this used to be one of my favorite series ever, I even liked Quest for Booty even though it only contained like 5 minutes of gaemplay.
The background graphics are at their worst, definately unmemorable enemies, the 1080p and menu tweaks can't save this title.
Why was this game aimed at 5 and under, E is supposed to stand for everyone, further more I think this used to be a teen rated series. It reminded my of being a kid and watching Sesame Street, I can't believe I'm referencing to that.
I do expect Arkham Asylum loads times from Isomniac, especially for worse graphics, but you have to wait for the levels to load, HOW COME iNinja on the Xbox didn't have to load WITHOUT an install, and it did look good, etc, for its time, but now I have to wait for the game to be installed just for it to load slower, this is bizarre and pathetic of gaming current state.
On a side note, the best DVD player on the market smoked the PS2 with the same load times, but the best Blu-ray players only look and sound better than the PS3 while having MASSIVE load times where the PS3 doesn't have to load at all.
This is quite a LOW-TECH generation without arguement. It's like this era should be dubbed THE ERA OF THE TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE CURSE. This is out of control and needed to be fixed immediately, not WAY later.
Whats next, a Teletubbies game pushed as Sony's flagship title for 2010.