Conquest, an entertaining rental
posted by HouseMN (SAINT PAUL, MN) Jan 21, 2009
Member since May 2008
38
out of
52
gamers (73%) found this review helpful
LOTR: Conquest brings the Battlefront style to Middle Earth. This game sticks very closely to the old Battlefront formula, a little too closely.
I'll break down the pro's and con's before going into some detail.
Goods:
- Many characters from LOTR are available to play
- Levels are decent sized
- Evil campaign gives an interesting change of fate for Middle Earth
- Multiplayer is fun (gee, really?)
Bads:
- Graphics aren't as good as they could be
- Campaigns are short
- Lack of replay value
- Way too easy (cheap ways) to die in certain spots of the campaign
More often than not I find myself playing a sequel, or a game made to emulate a different title, and thinking that "they should have stuck with what worked", or, "why did they change that?". With LOTR: Conquest, I found myself thinking "why didn't they change anything?!".
This game feels very much like Battlefront for the Xbox, too much infact. The graphics are nothing to write home about, there is no character development of any kind. Other than mindless killing (which I am a fan of) and achievements, there isn't really any reason to replay levels. A play through each campaign will net you roughly 60% of the gamer points, which can easily be done in one sitting (on an easy difficulty that is).
One redeeming point to this title is the "evil" campaign, which takes on the story as if the ring was not destroyed, and instead was returned to Sauron. I'm not going to lie, I really enjoyed pillaging the Shire. I killed a lot of hobbits.
I gave the game a 6 rating based on the fact it is fun for a while, but I regret paying $60 the day it came out. I am ready to sell it.
Worth a rental, but don't pay more than $20 - $25 for this title.
Was this review helpful?
Report
Abuse