Overview- Critic & User
Reviews - Videos &
Screenshots
News- Codes
& FAQs - Gameplay
Controls - Similar
Games
Answers
Bundles
Critic & User Reviews
1
Horrible
Hour of Victory
posted by kjgaucho (GOLETA, CA) May 7, 2008
Member since Mar 2008
8 out of 8 gamers (100%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
2
Really Bad
Easy Chevos Any Way
posted by TheColonel (BLOOMFIELD, IN) Aug 5, 2009
Member since Jul 2008
2 out of 2 gamers (100%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
Hour of Shame
posted by park10xbox (GREER, SC) Jul 18, 2009
Member since Jul 2008
2 out of 2 gamers (100%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
A truly bad game
posted by Blankets (CABOT, AR) Jul 7, 2009
Member since Aug 2008
1 out of 1 gamers (100%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
4
Weak
Wow. This game is bad.
posted by goeagles1 (CRANBURY, NJ) Mar 8, 2008
Member since Dec 2007
1 out of 1 gamers (100%) found this review helpful
Pros (there aren't many)
-Some mindless shooting fun. I guess...
-Hilarious physics engine (bodies flop and bounce and spaz)
-Mildly interesting locations such as castles
-Generic, but effective music
Cons (expect a lot)
-Broken A.I.
-Terrible graphics
-Plenty of bugs
-Boring level design
-Inacurate hit detection
-Sniper Rifles are impossible to use
-Horrid tank controls
-Another WW2 shooter (sigh)...
-Gimmicky Stealth, Sniper, and Commando classes
-Framerate Problems
-Bland Story
As you can clearly see, this is not a good game. Only as much as rent it if you are the most obsessive WW2 shooter fan in the world. Believe me, I wanted to enjoy this game, but it was impossible to enjoy.
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
4
Weak
Excellent Graphics Weak Game play
posted by BottomLine (MONTGOMERY VILLAGE, MD) Aug 27, 2007
Member since Aug 2007
1 out of 1 gamers (100%) found this review helpful
Sceptically about the game due to the many "Medal of Honor" FPS titles and their success, the bar had been set high for all the WWII era throw back FPS games. Although the games graphics deliver, the controller and game play are meager at best. Sluggish is the word that best describes HOV's character movement and overall game play. I'd recommend this title to those who have stress to release, or time to kill. "Medal of Honor" is far more enjoyable to play, despite the repetitious us of missions,characters,weapo- ns, etc.....
Cheers,
The "BottomLine"
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
2
Really Bad
WOW is all i can say
posted by denny417 (GLEN ELLYN, IL) Jul 9, 2007
Member since Jun 2006
19 out of 22 gamers (86%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
3
Bad
Waste Of Time
posted by Spincrazy7 (CANADIAN, TX) Jul 20, 2007
Member since Jul 2007
7 out of 8 gamers (88%) found this review helpful
There is nothing positive to say about this game. It is about as basic as they come for first person gameplay. I am just thankful it was a rental and not purchased at full price. I think I will just go back to playing Rainbow Six Vegas and wait for COD4 to come out. I just hope it isn't another COD2 clone like the last one.
Midway should be ashamed of this title!
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
2
Really Bad
Waste of time
posted by Costin (ROUND ROCK, TX) Jul 2, 2007
Member since Dec 2004
11 out of 13 gamers (85%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
4
Weak
This Is Horrible! Keep Playing Call Of Duty!
posted by Scorpion (SCOTTSDALE, AZ) Jul 1, 2007
Member since Apr 2005
14 out of 17 gamers (82%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
3
Bad
Weak for a Week.
posted by Buffalo11 (LONGMONT, CO) Jul 24, 2007
Member since Jul 2007
6 out of 7 gamers (86%) found this review helpful
The missions are either quick and effortless or long and boring... either way neither present much of a challenge.
Speaking of a challenge...the game gives you NO REASON WHAT SO EVER to want to play it on Hard or Veteran. No achievements, no reason to even bother. all of the levels give you an achievement for completion so there's no reason for the player to actually want to beat the levels other than for the achievements... which caused me to rush through it...
I liked 2 parts about the campaign... despite the lame storyline and pathetic attempt for different classes, the game did have a good physics engine, creating unique deaths and decent game play at times. the other thing i enjoyed was the fact that you lost every bullet that you still had in your clip when you reloaded. which made the game...more realistic i guess?...
It is a good game if your looking for easy achievements... so the campaign i'd have to give a 5.0 out of 10.0
Now the Multiplayer is absolutely horrible no matter how you look at it. It is so rediculously laggy that you can't even fire your gun 90% 0f the time...the maps are genearally huge and you can't even find someone to kill much less talk to... Every game you join is either boosters looking for easy achievements, or just too laggy to even enjoy.
The multiplayer gets a big goose egg from me.
0.0 out of 10.0
so it's only fair to average the 2...
My overall rating for Hour of Victory is 3.. I'll be nice and round up.
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
Terrible all around
posted by Saluki (NORTHBROOK, IL) Jul 27, 2007
Member since Mar 2005
10 out of 12 gamers (83%) found this review helpful
The graphics look like they would have been great in 1995. The gameplay is boring, there is no rubmle feedback from the weapons. The story is unrealistic and boring
Stay away
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
Could it be worse, NAH!!!
posted by AggieOnFir (WIMBERLEY, TX) Jul 28, 2007
Member since Jun 2007
4 out of 5 gamers (80%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
2
Really Bad
Worth A Rent (For Achievement Points Only).
posted by MattieD10 (RUTHERFORD, NJ) Jul 3, 2007
Member since Nov 2004
8 out of 11 gamers (73%) found this review helpful
Midway, next time you try and rip off the consumer by publishing such a terrible game at least make it look good and play decent.
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
5
Fair
A no-name entry into a monopolized market
posted by Phayd415 (WINTER SPRINGS, FL) Nov 15, 2007
Member since Jan 2004
3 out of 4 gamers (75%) found this review helpful
Compared to the incumbent champions; Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, and Brothers in Arms, this game falls short of the mark.
However this game does make a pretty good stab at the target. I has decent mission variety including vehicles, stealth missions, and multi-path levels that slightly change according to your character.
The level design is fairly decent, but some maps are abysmally short in length.
Overall, this game is decent from afar. "Smart" (but somewhat buggy) AI, good weapon sounds and bearable music, some semblance of a storyline...
It is when you pick up the controls that the cursing and frustration begins.
There's just something wrong with the aiming...I think it is the pressure sensitive analog stick which seems to have two levels of response: Too fast and Too slow. The auto-aiming feature negates strafing, meaning that if you try to side-step your reticle over a target, the auto-aim "corrects" your shot so that you are still missing your target by an inch.
I ended up playing the game without auto-aim and the sensitivity significantly increased, which made for plenty of embarrassing missed shots and the eventual abandonment of accuracy for spray n' pray.
Pros:
+ Somewhat smart AI: takes cover accordingly
+ Good weapon sounds
+ Decent mission variety
+ Call of Duty inspired action cut-scenes
+ At least attempts to capture COD feel with friendly AI soldiers
+ Levels play slightly different for each class
+ Something that resembles a storyline
+ Easy Achievements (500+ single-player on easy setting)
Cons:
- Bad aiming controls
- Short missions with no mid-point checkpoints (or very few missions broken up with load times).
- Buggy AI (can sometimes shoot you when not looking at you)
- Doesn't exploit the variation in class well enough (IMO)
- Storyline is fairly unrealistic
- Nobody online (not really the game's fault!)
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
Worse WWII Game Ever
posted by jPoz63 (ANSONIA, CT) Oct 19, 2007
Member since Sep 2007
3 out of 4 gamers (75%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
2
Really Bad
awful
posted by mars188 (BRISTOW, OK) Jun 29, 2007
Member since Dec 2003
16 out of 25 gamers (64%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
Please tell me......WHY WOULD MIDWAY SPONSOR THIS!
posted by irish93 (SAUGUS, MA) Jul 12, 2007
Member since Oct 2006
2 out of 4 gamers (50%) found this review helpful
Please WW2 fans if want a great game like this cept better....100x better please either replay a call of duty or wait for medal of honor:air borne.
P.S: Now i know why midway has such tiny text on the cover of the case.....
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
2
Really Bad
Didn`t someone tell them about COD2???
posted by Hammer (NEWTON, IL) Jul 20, 2007
Member since Dec 2005
1 out of 2 gamers (50%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
I through up after playing this Game
posted by VideoGames (RAMONA, CA) Jul 1, 2007
Member since Aug 2006
14 out of 33 gamers (42%) found this review helpful
CAUTION: MAY KILL YOU INSTANTLY
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
What a catastrophe...
posted by hoss7071 (MOBILE, AL) Jul 2, 2007
Member since Jun 2005
4 out of 9 gamers (44%) found this review helpful
Stay away people, this game hurts!
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
A Discrace to All WWII FPS or FPS in general
posted by xX360Xx (WEST ROXBURY, MA) Jul 10, 2007
Member since Jul 2007
1 out of 3 gamers (33%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
Do NOT rent/buy this game!!
posted by HaloPr0 (MARYSVILLE, WA) Jul 5, 2007
Member since Feb 2007
1 out of 3 gamers (33%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
1
Horrible
this is for the best................... it STINKS!
posted by Codcrazy1 (LEHI, UT) Jul 30, 2007
Member since Feb 2006
1 out of 4 gamers (25%) found this review helpful
2.someone else has created games like this where u are a commando, sniper and what not called the entire COD games.
3.whats the point every other company has made pretty good WW2 games that have covered pretty much every thing from D-DAY, Normandy break out, kursk, stalingrad, african front and pacific front.
4.i think there is more oppertunity now that every one has covered every thing for example COD4 Modern combat is coming out this year.
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse
3
Bad
how could it all go so wrong...
posted by shadow94 (KNOXVILLE, IL) Jul 17, 2007
Member since Apr 2005
1 out of 4 gamers (25%) found this review helpful
Was this review helpful? Report Abuse


