Black ops 2 has gotten a little better than Black ops only because of scorestreaks and zombies. Everything is the same, like Modern Warfare 3 and Black ops combined with a couple things added, but overall its not very different from any other Call of Duty games, but it is still ok.
posted by gman11 (HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO) Mar 23, 2013
Member since Jun 2012
I have played every Call of Duty and my interest towards them have dropped significantly, especially from the single player. This Cod delivers the same type of single player action, and its same multiplayer, which redeems Black Ops II.
GRAPHICS - The graphics are the same as all the previous Call of Duties, which is a little above average. Some of the characters' faces were either rushed or just badly done.
GAMEPLAY - The only part that I really liked about this Call of Duty from the rest was the guns. The futuristic guns are very cool as well as the new attachments. Even the guns that are in all of the Cods' like M16 and M4, generally sound a-lot better.
SOUND - The sound of the guns, in my opinion, sound much better and more realistic, as well as more powerful. In the previous CODs', all the guns pretty much sounded the same, but in this one they all sound different and powerful, making the game a little more fun.
I thought the campaign was very bland, as well as very short. It didn't grab my attention enough for me to follow what was going on throughout the game.
Even though I am a very generous reviewer and it's very hard for me to rate a game harshly, but I don't think this game was very good at all. The only thing that kept me wanting to play more was its classic fun multiplayer.