So basically I am just confirming what many of others have said on here. This is COD same old thing. Nothing really new but the story line. In fact the game really didn't get good until the last 3 missions (which are the best and the most action). The most annoying thing besides the lack luster graphics and the missions being too short is going from year 2025 weapons to 1986 weapons and back again. Once you get used to a high-tech weapon you go back to the past and use an AK47. Good for a rental, but not my thing...I'll stick to MW.
QUIT COMPLAINING!! they gave you what you wanted !
posted by bblack300 (LAFAYETTE, IN) Nov 16, 2012
Member since Feb 2011
gamers (25%) found this review helpful
Yes it's not entirely perfect, but its a lot better than MW3. The campaign blows away the average game by today's standards, and the multiplayer is awesome and groundbreaking if you remember to include zombies in your rating.
Do you people realize your dissection of the small flaws of this great game are causing its member rating to drop below : Pokemon, little big planet, Ratchet and Clank and others that are even more embarrassing.
The people of Treyarch - that brought you World at War and Black Ops - the 2 best multiplayer FPS games deserve better from their fans !!!
The Cons: limited multiplayer map diversity - but with some DLC and some patches most of that will be close to perfection
The Pros : it's freaking awesome and will most likely spend more time in your console than any other game. Lmfao , but its true and you know it.
I'm not even a hardcore COD'er and I rented it outta the redbox cause I didn't want to wait for my copy to arrive, something I did not resort to with Borderlans 2, or AC 3. So that pretty much says it all ;)