after i finished this game i was really surprised by the ending of how not good it was. but other than that this game has a lot of surprises but after you play the campaign for the first time your just blown away by how realistic it is. but at the same time their are flaws to the campaign. ITS ONLY SEVEN MISSIONS LONG THAT TO ME IS TO SHORT. you could literally beat the game in less than 4 hours. no battlefield game should never be less than seven short missions. plus the reason is that the ending is not that good is becuz when your ship is being attacked by the enemy ship and your squad mates are fighting who should detonate the c4 you could easily volunteer to go down and blown up the ship cuz otherwise your just wasting your time hanging from a bridge while your ship is being blown up. other than that the graphics are good. the audio is a little bit off tone. im glad that they put in the really good guns too. but still it was a bit of a disappointment to me.
posted by Alucardofshadow (ANTIOCH, CA) Feb 5, 2014
Member since Jan 2013
I played battlefield 3 to escape the slow paced over repeted call of duty. When i heard that battlefield was getting another well desvered sequal i was thrilled then i got hold of battlefield 4 the story was dry, overtold, and way too short. on to the part you care about the online lets begin with the glitches and bugs from the connection issuses to the freezing of consoles but theres no more to dwell on each problem, so lets talk game play its going the way of COD it all comes down to your internet connection but in good ping games no matter what game type your going to see all your kill cams feature the assault kit due to dice making assualt rifles fire too fast and with way to much damage and i hate to say this but dice like 3arc and activision only pander to the single man not the team in short if you want something different play battlefield 3 :(