The game is a good one but not very challenging i beat the story on hard the day i got it and the online servers suck you constantly get thrown back to the multiplayer start screen, last night i palyed 10 games but only finished 2 of them thats how bad the servers suck..... If they can fix that by all mean it is worth checking it out but if you are a hardcore multiplayer person you are going to get frustrated with the servers/camping kids/snipers...
The graphix and gameplay are phenominal in the campaign mode. It could be improved on if there was a better way to stay behind cover and lean out. It could also use a wider array of weapons. The online multiplayer version I did not like at all. Nowhere near as good an online player experience as the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare sagas.
posted by JackMarsh (OVERLAND PARK, KS) Oct 13, 2010
Member since Oct 2010
Let me get this out of the way right away: The singleplayer is absolutely awful. Just terrible. The story is, well, mehh. The gameplay seems completely different from the multiplayer gameplay. The framerate is sluggish, the sprinting animation sucks, but, the graphics and sound are o...k (I've seen better). The only thing I like about the single player is that the deaths are more gory than the multiplayer. That is just about it. Imo, they did a bad job by using two engines for the campaign and multiplayer.
However, the multiplayer is TOTALLY FLIPPING AWESOME. It's basically a call of duty/bad company hybrid. they did a really good job incorporating both of the good ideas of the two together, and making it into one heck of a multiplayer. My favorite mode is currently the one where you defend the two bombsites from the other team (I forget what it's called. Something, defense). It does a good job of not being over-realistic like the single player, and the gunplay/sprinting seem to be a lot more fluent than the single player. Give this one a try if you have xbox live or psn. But if you don't, AVOID IT AT ALL COSTS. Hope you liked my review.