posted by nexttopmodel (MCCULLOM LAKE, IL) Nov 11, 2011
Member since Jul 2011
Make this quick and sweet. Overall the sounds and game movement is a lot better quality. The maps have more overall "stuff" in it but beware of the "campers" online. I know they meant this to be a more gun vs gun game and they succeeded. I prefer black ops as it has more open maps and general more weapons other than the bullet .
posted by danzrboy77 (CAMERON PARK, CA) Nov 10, 2011
Member since Jun 2011
Id say 8-9 outta 10. Its pretty good. The campaign is definetly an improvement over last few cods. The control is silky smooth and graphic improvements are noticeable. ie gun details. Online was where it fell a little short for me. It felt pretty similar to mw2 with a new map pack. U will miss some features from black ops which definetely cleaned up the gameplay and loadouts. Still worth it though in my opinion but has lost some steam unless we really see something new next time around.
posted by alec4yu (RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA) Nov 10, 2011
Member since Oct 2011
If you liked the previous ones, then you'll definitely like this one. Let's be honest, its the same exact type of gameplay, and graphics as the previous two. (MW2 & BlackOps) Seems like all they did was add a killstreak or two and all new maps. Luckily I have Gamefly and didn't buy this one. If you're looking for a different type of "war" gameplay and better graphics, then Battlefield 3 caught my eye. Ended up buying that one after trying the two. But to each his own!